"Truth can be stated in a thousand different ways, yet each one can be true." - Swami Vivekanand

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

मंडुकोपनिषद

निवडणुकांचा मोसम आला...पडघम वाजू लागले...काही दिवसांनी मतदानाचा पाउस पडेल...हिरवे गवत उगवेल नवनिर्वाचित लोकप्रतिनिधींचे आणि लुसलुशीत कुरणे तयार होतील...पुन्हा नव्याने चरायला...


मला माझ्या रुपारेल कॉलेजची खूप आठवण होते.. विशेषतः पावसाळ्यातल्या त्या मस्त कँपसची..
पावसाळा आला की तिथे पहिल्या आठवड्यात नुसते डराँव डराँव चालू असायचे बेडकांचे..! इथून तिथे उड्या घेत असत हे बेडूक. आजचे उमेदवार आणि राजकीय नेते हे असेच नव्हेत काय? या पक्षातून त्या पक्षात, त्या पक्षातून अजून पलिकडे...
कसलाच धरबंध नाही...कोणी तिकीट मिळाले नाही म्हणून, कोणी कोणाला तिकीट दिले म्हणून, कोणी हव्या त्या मतदारसंघाचे तिकीट मिळाले नाही म्हणून, कोणी नातेवाईकाला उमेदवारी दिली नाही म्हणून...

मग काहींनी तर पक्षाच्याच कार्यालयावर हल्ले केले. खळ्ळ-खट्टॅक, फळ्ळ-फट्टॅक अन् राडा सुरु झाला. नासधूस, धक्काबुक्की, शिवीगाळ, तोडफोड अशा शब्दांना उठाव आला. समजूत काढण्याचे प्रयत्न सुरु झाले. चूक या निराश-हताश इच्छुकांचीच आहे. आपण कोणत्या स्वार्थी जमातीची तळी उचलून भांडत आहोत हे बिचाऱ्यांना आधीच समजायला हवे होते. कोणासाठी आपण पोलिस केसेस अंगावर घेत आहोत, कोणासाठी वडापाव खाऊन उन्हातान्हात कंठशोष करून घोषणाबाजी करत आहोत, कोणासाठी बायकामुलांकडे दुर्लक्ष करत आहोत हे कळायला हवे होते. तेव्हा बाईकवर झेंडे लावून घेतले, नंबरप्लेट्स बदलून घेतल्या, रॅल्या काढल्या.. आणि आता जेव्हा उमेदवारी कोणाला कोणत्या निकषावर दिली गेली, त्यामागचा ‘अर्थ’ कळल्यावर भ्रमनिरास झाला.

पक्षनिष्ठा हा शब्द तर कालबाह्यच झालाय जणू. पद-प्रतिष्ठा-पैसा हे मिळायला हवे, मग ते कोणत्याही पक्षातून का असेना, हा विचार बळावत चाललेला दिसून येतो. आयाराम-गयाराम ने ग्रासलेली राजनीती सर्वांचेच नुकसान करणारी आहे. ‘उमेदवारी नाही मिळाली तरी मी पक्षाचे काम करत राहीन कारण त्या विचारसरणीवर माझी श्रद्धा आहे. त्यासाठी मी घाम गाळला आहे.’ हा विचार होत नाही. पक्ष कोणाला तरी एकालाच तिकीट/उमेदवारी देऊ शकतो हेही तितकेच खरे. परंतु या कार्यकर्त्यांचेही बरोबर आहे, जर पैसे घेऊन तिकीट दिले जात असेल, नातेवाईकांना उमेदवारी दिली जात असेल तर त्यांनी तरी गप्प का बसावे?

तेव्हा बेडूकरावांचे गर्जन सुरु झाले आहे. टपाटप उड्या चालू झाल्यात. कुणी ‘आनंद’ घ्या कुणी मुकुंद घ्या अशी परिस्थिती आहे. कोणाचा कोणाला पायपोस नाही. नेत्यांनाही हे कळण्याची आवश्यकता आहे की आपण ज्याला राबवून घेतला आणि इतरांची डोकी फोडायला, राडा करायला वापरला तोच आपल्यावर उलटू शकतो. ‘करावे तसे भरावे’ या न्यायाने आपण जे बी लावले त्याची येणारी ही फळे आहेत. ती चाखावीच लागणार.  


Saturday, January 28, 2012

Satanic Forces!


Human Rights must be guaranteed in a democracy in order to be a meaningful democracy. Can world’s largest democracy protect the rights of it's citizens by turning blind eye to the present situation and future challenges?

The immediate concern is the sub-judice case by Google and Facebook before Delhi high Court. Actually it is an appeal against lower Court’s order. 

It involves showing of objectionable content on it's webpages. This content is created by perverse users registered on these sites. Some viewers complained against it and Court threatened these sites to shut them down in Bharat. Now against that order of lower Court, Google and Facebook have appealed to the Delhi HC.

Second such incident is the happenings at the Jaipur Literature Festival (JLF) in Rajasthan. The organizers had invited Salman Rushdie to participate in the JLF. He had agreed to come, and announcement to that effect was made. But some forces started opposing his arrival and protested largely. It was all due to meager chunk of people, who ignited all the community. Government suggested Rushdie to avoid coming to Bharat. Threat to his life was the reason. Who threatened his life? Who issued fatwas? Is our Government so weak that it cannot go ahead to protect a person for some days? Is it really so feeble to bow against some extremist blockheads?

4 authors went ahead and read out passages from ‘Satanic Verses’. Now the Rajasthan Govt is behind them. They left Jaipur abruptly in fear of arrests. So is the state of ‘freedom of speech and expression’.

Infact the Rule of Law in Bharat is sufficient to deal with both the situations. The users who posted and published objectionable content can be very well booked and punished under the Indian Penal Code and Information Technology Act, 2000. Such is the case with the extremists who say ‘we won’t allow such and such person to enter Bharat’. Are they Govt.? or Constitutional sanctioning authority? Will Govt depend upon their approval? Does it not show absence of sovereignty in the Govt? Thus it is high time now, Govt should deal in strong and stern manner with these non-State actors. Who undermine the sovereignty of Govt. Political will is needed. One cannot expect the ‘vote-hungry crowd’ to discharge the duties properly. ‘Vote-bank greed’ won’t allow you to act rationally.

Like Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasreen – Bangladeshi writer in exile – faces the same fate. Threats, endless feeling of insecurity, constant danger, frenzied mobs and satanic forces! What is their fault? To speak out against violation of Human Rights? They need to be protected and to be given the freedom to make people aware about the religious fanaticism and ideological extremism.

One can argue very well that the case of M F Hussain was similar to Mr. Rushdie or Shrimati Taslima Nasreen. Why then M F Hussain be condemned and Rushdie and Nasreen be protected and given free hand? This is very attractive argument to defend the case of Hussain. Also it seems valid prima-facie. But one needs to consider some basic difference between the two cases and then arrive at a conclusion.

M F Hussain was himself a Muslim. And he painted Hindu Gods and Goddesses in such a manner which hurt Hindu sentiments. He never painted any other religious figures than Hindu, in derogatory manner – to which some perverts regarded as an ‘art’. But did his ‘art’ prevent him from depicting other religious Gods but Hindu deities? Hence Hussain can be said to be a part of the fashionable cult whose only agenda seems to attack Hindu beliefs in Bharat. Such is not the case with Salman Rushdie and shrimati Taslima Nasreen. They themselves are born in Muslim families and they talk about the dangerous trends in Islam. They wish to eradicate the things detrimental to humanity at large. They need to be given the status of ‘reformationists’. Every religion except Islam has undergone the process of reformation at some or the other point of time. Many have undergone such process more than once. But Islam is an exception.

The thing which opposes reformation ceases to exist. Animals, plants, birds, insects, structures, machines, theories need evolution and reformation to maintain it's existence. Be it a lively or lifeless thing – natural or manmade – change and adaptation to changing environment is a must. How a religion can be exception to this eternal rule?

Thus Islam needs to come out of stagnation and accept new things. Salman Rushdie and shrimati Taslima Nasreen are the voices of billions of oppressed women and compelled children born in Islam. The voice of justified silent sufferers. It should not be suppressed. Humanity ought to give protection to such fearless and courageous ‘reformationists’ and contribute to their relentless efforts for the Herculean task.




Friday, January 20, 2012

Protecting Minority Rights in Bharat.


This is a summary on the topic of the above Title, presented by me in recent visit to European Countries. -
असतो मा सद्गमय,
तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय,
मृत्योर्मा अमृतं गमय,
ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः |

I belong to the ancient land of seers and sages who devoted their lives in quest of peace and emancipation of soul. Gautam Buddha, as we all know, left his palace in search of peace. Today, the world is facing serious problems of Human Rights violations and atrocities on vulnerable sections. Terrorism, religious fundamentalism and ideological extremism are some of the most dreadful challenges before human race. We, as one of the oldest civilizations in the world – Hindu Civilization or more popularly known as Indus valley civilization, have lot to share with the world to make it a better and more beautiful place.

India i.e. Bharat has now a total population of about 120 crores (more than 1 billion). Owing to different languages, sects, religions (worship modes), cultures, regional varieties of costumes and cuisines, philosophies, we have a great mosaic of social patterns. All these aspects make every individual hail from minority community. But as a whole, Indian populace is one united nation owing to various factors providing a base to establish unity.

Minorities based on religion: India is essentially a Hindu Nation. Not by religion but by culture and tradition. Infact this culture has enabled India to assimilate the invaders, refugees, intruders into the mainstream and grow with them. The prayer from Vedas (oldest known literature to mankind) says, “आ नो भद्राः क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वतः|” (aa no bhadrah kratavo yantu vishvataha) meaning “let noble thoughts come to us from all directions). Today we have Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Jews as religious minorities. To protect their rights and bring them to mainstream, Government of India has a separate ministry called ‘Ministry of Minority Affairs’[1]. Its budgetary allocation was ` 2500 crores (25,000 millions). It provides for scholarships, freeships and other beneficial policies for persons from religious minorities. India had 2 Muslim Presidents as of yet. Today also Vice President is a Muslim viz. Hameed Ansari.

The Constitution of India is supreme law of the land and is a custodian of fundamental rights. It specifically confers upon its citizens the Rights to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25 to 28). Stretching this Freedom too far, some groups try to convert people from one religion to their own. This is done by force, allurement or under the garb of service. Such mass conversion destroys the indigenous culture of that group. Mahatma Gandhiji had said, If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink.” (November 5, 1935). In protection of minority rights in North-East India, I urge you all to experience the indigenous culture there and visualize the mass conversion resulting into not only the demographic change but also destroying cultural identities.

So is the case with tribals in India. Tribal population is 8.43 crore i.e. 8.2% of total population[2]. Tribals are nature worshippers. They consider God in trees, snakes, cows, birds and rivers. Some groups are trying to destroy their culture and convert them to their own fold. Constitution of India considers these tribals as Scheduled Tribes. Special provisions are made to protect their culture. Many NGOs like Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram are working for them.

Parsis hail originally from Iran. They arrived on western coast of India. They and people on the coast were unable to communicate with each other, as each other’s languages were not known to them. The King there gave a glass filled with milk completely upto the brim. This was to tell the Parsis that there is remains no space to live. But the Parsis put a spoonful of sugar into it and suggested that we will live here amiably and assimilate with society as sugar in the milk. Today, Parsis are only 69,000. They are really a minority. But they have shown merit and achievement in many fields. They never subjected to any human rights violation ever. Tatas and Godrej are one of the biggest industrialists in the country. Only 2 persons were conferred title of Field Marshal by independent India and 1 of them is Parsi viz. Sam Manekshaw.

Jews lived a very safe life in India. When they were facing atrocities in various parts of the world, in India their community enjoyed freedom and liberty. Today also, being a minority they never feel subjected to any discrimination.

Regional Minorities: India is a Union of States. Every State has its own State Government but all people are governed by the Constitution of India. The exception is the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This State has its own Constitution and special status. The people known as Kashmiri Pundits were forced to leave the valley. This exodus from the valley resulted in seven lakh Kashmiri Pundits to stay away from their homeland and to live elsewhere in the country as refugees.[3] Their condition is pathetic. I take this opportunity to bring to light the real state of the affair.

The Jammu and Kashmir has always been a part of India. Lakhs of Hindu pilgrims visit the shrines of Amarnath and Vaishnodevi every year.

Indian Army builds bridges, roads and dams with its mechanical and engineering divisions. But it is wrongly blamed for Human Rights violations in the valley. The terrorism, especially cross border terrorism, is the real cause of Army’s presence there. Now it’s a debatable question whether terrorists have human rights, but apart this, Kashmir remains attraction for international policy makers. Recently, the Global Human Rights Defence (GHRD) in partnership with the Human Rights Focus Pakistan (HRFP) held a press conference in Muzaffarabad and brought in light the key issues in Pakistan Administered Kahsmir (PAK) as[4]:
a.      Unavailability of the right of minorities to vote in elections.
b.      Lack of political representation of minorities in the national Assembly.
c.      Lack of citizenship for minorities.
d.      Lack of employment opportunities for minorities.
Three approaches are there to solve the Kashmir issue:
1. Jammu & Kashmir belongs to India given its history and accession instrument signed by the then King of Jammu & Kashmir.
2. Jammu & Kashmir belongs to Pakistan given its Islamic majority population.
3. Jammu & Kashmir is a separate state i.e. Azaad Kashmir – i.e. nothing to do with either India or Pakistan.
To decide which among the three will be the correct answer to the problem, some suggest plebiscite. And it is very fair approach. Let the people living there decide about their choice. But the demand for plebiscite could have been the right approach some 60 years ago i.e. in 1947, when the population was mainly the original residents living for generations. Now seven lakh (7,00,000) were driven out in this six dreadful decades Will the plebiscite be justifiable now? Bringing back all these exiles, rehabilitating them and then performing plebiscite would be the right course to solve the problem and end the tussle over Kashmir issue.

Naxalite/Maoist movement: This is armed rebellion in some underdeveloped parts of India. It is matter of fact that those parts are lagging behind in development and availability of resources. But armed rebellion is not the answer. The movement has killed over 10,000 people in last 5 years[5]. These deaths include civilians, alongwith security personnel. Naxal leaders, causing this genocide, claim it to be for the underdeveloped tribals and villagers. But in the process tribals to do not show allegiance to this movement are brutally killed. The international links of this movement should be checked for supplies of ammunition and finance. They claim to be followers of Maoist ideology.

Linguistic Minorities: There are mainly 22 languages recognized by the Constitution of India e.g. Bengali, Gujrati, Marathi etc. But there are more than 800 dialects. Many dialects have their own literature. Linguistic minorities never face the problem of discrimination or coercion from main languages in any form. They cherish their own parlance of communication. All these Indic languages are products and derivatives of Sanskrit.
Dalits – Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes: Casteism prevalent in Hindu religion have caused the genesis of downtrodden minorities called as Dalits. In ancient days, person’s occupation ensued his/her caste. And child used to learn father’s occupation and continue with it as grown up. This resulted into a situation where taking birth intro certain community was decisive of that person’s caste.

People doing menial work considered to be of lower caste. The same occupation continued for generations and it resulted into inverse position. A person taking birth into certain caste had to take up the occupation of his forefathers’. Untouchability was like adding insult to injury. This caused downtrodden class of certain catses considered as lowest on the social strata.

Efforts for emancipation of Dalits: Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar was himself a Dalit born in 1891 in a family having lowest social status at that time. He faced embarrassing situations. But he did his education with confidence and went to London School of Economics where he completed his D.Sc. Then he was awarded with a Ph.D. by Columbia University in America. When he returned to India he dreamt of social justice for his brethren and struggled for it. He is considered as the Architect of the Constitution of India, for he was the Chairperson of the Drafting Committee for the Constitution. Therefore we find ample provisions in the Constitution for giving social justice to the oppressed and discriminated castes.

Dalit community is also progressing. Presently the Chief Minister of India’s biggest state is a Dalit woman. We had Dalit Vice Chancellors for Mumbai University as well as Pune University[6]. Dalit industrialists and businesspersons have come together and formed ‘Dalit Chamber of Commerce’[7]. The community is awakened to their social, political and economic rights and is progressing day by day.
Today, apart from Constitutional, legal and statutory provisions, the real solution would be to mingle with people from Dalit community and convince them about the importance of education and assimilate them into the mainstream by giving them respect and honour.

The Hindu civilization and its oldest scriptures give us some principles, which are essential for world peace. I end up here with mentioning some of them.
1.      Idea of global village: This thought is known as वसुधैव कुटुंबकम् (vasudhaiv kutumbakam) meaning, “whole world is one family”. Today due to technological advancements, we have come so closer that one cannot turn blind eye to other country’s problems, as they ultimately affect every country to some extent. Be it EURO concern or terrorism, we shall stand united to face these challegens.
2.      One Truth, various ways: एकं सत् विप्राः बहुधा वदन्ति | (ekam sat, viprah bahudha vadanti) meaning our ultimate aim is one, but the ways to reach this goal are different. Therefore, God is one, and everybody tries to reach him by various ways of worship, we call it as religions. Thus for religious tolerance and freedom to profess religion, this maxim is essential. Some scriptures give example as raindrops fallen at different places come through different rivers and brooks but ultimately merge into sea. That should be the idea behind unifying mankind having different religions.
3.      Love towards ecology and nature: Hindu philosophy believes that God is all pervading. In Swami Vivekananda’s words, Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divinity within by controlling nature, external and internal. Do this either by work, or worship or psychic control, or philosophy, by one, or more or all of these -and be free. This is the whole of religion. Doctrines, or dogmas; rituals, or books, or temples, or forms, are but secondary details."

Ultimately I pray for happiness to all of us: सर्वे भवन्तु सुखिनः, सर्वे सन्तु निरामयाः, सर्वे भद्राणि पश्यन्तु, मा कश्चिद् दुःखमाप्नुयात् | ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः| (May everyone be happy, may everyone be free from all diseases, may everyone see goodness and auspiciousness in everything, may none be unhappy or distressed. Aum peace, peace, peace!)

Sunday, October 16, 2011

अपघात, मदत आणि कायदा...

अपघात नेहमीच अचानक आणि न ठरवता होतात. ठरवून घडवला तर घातपात होतो. आणि अपघात मनुष्याच्या निष्काळजीपणामुळे अथवा यंत्रांच्या बिघाडामुळे होतात. परंतु अपघात घडल्यानंतर तो कोणाच्या निष्काळजीपणामुळे झाला, कोण चूक, कोण बरोबर हे ठरविण्यापेक्षाही त्या अपघातात सापडलेल्या अभागी जीवाला मदत पोहोचवणे हे अधिक गरजेचे असते.

साधा रस्त्यावरचा अपघात घेतला तरी त्यात लोक जखमीच्या मदतीला जायला, त्याला रुग्णालयात न्यायला घाबरतात. ते बरेचदा कचरतात याचं कारण म्हणजे पुढील चौकशीचा ससेमिरा. म्हणून प्रत्यक्ष मदत करणारे फार कमी आणि बघ्यांची मात्र हीss गर्दी असेच दृश्य आढळते. रुग्णालयात नेल्यानंतरसुद्धा तिथे उपचार सुरु होण्याआधी औपचारिक चौकश्या, कागदपत्र बनविणे, बरोबर कोणी आहे का, नातेवाईक कोण आहेत, पोलिसांना कळवले का, त्यांचा कागद आणला का अशा सर्व यक्षप्रश्नांना मदतीसाठी सरसावलेल्या व्यक्तींना सामोरे जावे लागते. आणि या कटकटीमुळेच मनात इच्छा असूनही लोक मदतीला जात नाहीत. या सर्वाचा परिणाम मात्र त्या रुग्णाला सहन करावा लागतो. कधीकधी तर रुग्णाचे प्राणोत्क्रमणही होण्याची शक्यता असते.

हे सर्व कायदा, कायद्याची भीती, कोर्टकचेरी यामुळे होत असल्याचे न्यायपालिकेच्या लक्षात आले. ही परिस्थिती अशीच राहणे कोणाच्याच हिताचे नाही आणि ती बदलायला हवी हे लक्षात घेऊन न्यायपालिकेने १९८९ साली एक महत्वपूर्ण निकाल दिला, जो अजूनही प्रसिद्धीअभावी जनसामान्यांपर्यंत पोहोचलेला नाही. प्रस्तुत निकालाची पार्श्वभूमी व त्यातील काही अंश येथे उधृत करत आहे.

पंडित परमानंद कटारा यांनी १९८८ साली एक रीट याचिका सर्वोच्च न्यायालयात दाखल केली. (Criminal Writ Petition no. 270 of 1988). सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने दि. २८.८.१९८९ रोजी परमानंद कटारा विरुद्ध भारत संघराज्य (Pt. Parmanand Katara v/s Union of India)  या निकालाद्वारे आपले विचार प्रकट केले आहेत. न्या. रंगनाथ मिश्रा आणि न्या. जी. एल. ओझा यांनी प्रस्तुत निकालपत्र दिले आहे. (CITATION: 1989 AIR 2039, 1989 SCR (3) 997, 1989 SCC (4) 286, JT 1989 (3) 496, 1989 SCALE (2)380http://www.rishabhdara.com/sc/view.php?case=9617

स्कूटरवरून जाणाऱ्या एका व्यक्तीला चारचाकी गाडीने उडवले आणि ती गाडी पुढे निघून गेली. एका सहृदय माणसाला रक्ताच्या थारोळ्यात पडलेल्या त्या स्कूटरचालकाला मदत करावीशी वाटली आणि तो त्याला घेऊन जवळच्या रुग्णालयात गेला; परंतु तिथे त्याला दुसऱ्या एका रुग्णालयाचे नाव सुचविण्यात आले आणि सांगण्यात आले की, ‘रुग्णाला घेऊन तिथेच जावे लागेल, कारण त्या रुग्णालयात न्याय-वैद्यक बाबी पहिल्या जातात.’(medico-legal cases). ते दुसरे रुग्णालय तिथून २० किमी अंतरावर होते. मदत करणाऱ्या व्यक्तिने लगेच तिथपर्यंत पोहोचण्याचा प्रयत्न केला; परंतु दुर्दैवाने वाटेतच त्या अपघातग्रस्त स्कूटरचालकाचे जखमांमुळे निधन झाले. प्रस्तुत घटनेची बातमी तत्कालीन ‘हिंदुस्तान टाईम्स’ मध्ये छापून आली. त्याचे शीर्षकच होते ‘Law helps the injured to die’. आणि या बातमीच्या आधारेच पंडित परमानंद कटारा यांनी याचिका दाखल केली.



न्यायालयाने या घटनेची गंभीर नोंद घेत भविष्यात असे प्रकार टाळण्यासाठी आपल्या निकालात निरीक्षणे नोंदवून निर्देश दिले. या निकालपत्राचे महत्व यामुळेच वाढते की, त्यात सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने अशा घटनांमध्ये वैद्यकीय सेवा पुरविणाऱ्या संस्था/व्यक्ती यांची भूमिका काय असावी हे स्पष्ट केले आहे.

Per Ranganath Mishra J. “It should be the duty of a doctor in each and every casualty department of the hospital to attend such person first and thereafter take care of the formalities under the Criminal Procedure Code. The life of a person is far more important than the legal formalities. In view of this, the deponent feels that it is in the interest of general human life and welfare that the Government should immediately make such provisions in law and amendments in the existing laws, if required, so that immediate medical relief and care to injured persons and/or serious patients are available without any delay and without waiting for legal formalities to be completed in the presence of the police officers. The doctor attending such patients should be indemnified under law from any action by the Government/police authorities/any person for not waiting for legal formalities before giving relief as a doctor would be doing his professional duty; for which he has taken oath as medical practitioner.

Per G. L. Oza J. Some apprehensions were expressed because of some misunderstanding about the law of procedure and the police regulations and the priorities in such situations. On the basis of the affidavit filed by the Union of India and considering the matter it is clear that there is no legal impediment for a medical professional when he is called upon or requested to attend to an injured person needing his medical assistance immediately. There is also no doubt that the effort to save the person should be the top priority not only of the medical professional but even of the police or any other citizen who happens to be connected with the matter or who happens to notice such an incident or a situation. But on behalf of the medical profession there is one more apprehension which sometimes prevents a medical professional in spite of his desire to help the person, as he apprehends that he will be witness and may have to face the police interrogation which sometimes may need going to the police station repeatedly and waiting and also to be a witness in a court of law where also he apprehends that he may have to go on number of days and may have to wait for a long time and may have to face sometimes long unnecessary cross-examination which sometimes may even be humiliating for a man in the medical profession and in our opinion it is this apprehension which prevents a medical professional who is not entrusted with the duty of handling medico-legal cases to do the needful, he always tries to avoid and even if approached directs the person concerned to go to a State hospital and particularly to the person who is in charge of the medico-legal cases. We there- fore have no hesitation in assuring the persons in the medical profession that these apprehensions, even if have some foundation, should not prevent them from discharging their duty as a medical professional to save a human life and to do all that is necessary but at the same time. We hope and trust that with this expectation from the members of the medical profession, the policy, the members of the legal profession, our law courts and everyone concerned will also keep in mind that a man in the medical profession should not be unnecessarily harassed for purposes of inter- rogation or for any other formality and should not be dragged during investigations at the police station and it should be avoided as far as possible. We also hope and trust that our law courts will not summon a medical professional to give evidence unless the evidence is necessary and even if he is summoned, attempt should be made to see that the men in this profession are not made to wait and waste time unnecessarily and it is known that our law courts always have respect for the men in the medical profession and they are called to give evidence when necessary and attempts are made so that they may not have to wait for long. We have no hesitation in saying that it is expected of the members of the legal profession which is the other honourable profession to honour the persons in the medical profession and see that they are not called to give evidence so long as it is not necessary. It is also expected that where the facts are so clear it is expected that necessary harassment of the members of the medical profession either by way of requests for adjournments or by cross examination should be avoided so that the apprehension that the men in the medical profession have which prevents them from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost, is removed and a citizen needing the assistance of a man in the medical profession receives it.

We would also like to mention that whenever on such occasions a man of the medical profession is approached and if he finds that whatever assistance he could give is not sufficient really to save the life of the person but some better assistance is necessary-it is also the duty of the man in the medical profession so approached to render all the help which he could and also see that the person reaches the proper expert as early as possible.

तेव्हा या निकालाची पुरेशी प्रसिद्धी करण्याचे निर्देशही निकालपत्रातच दिले आहेत; परंतु आजही डॉक्टर्स, परिचारिका, वैद्यकीय सेवा पुरविणाऱ्या संस्था, विशेषतः अपघात विभाग, सामान्य जनता, समाजसेवी संस्था, रुग्णमित्र, पोलीस, वकील अशांना याची माहिती नाही. या जनजागृतीतून कित्येक जीव वाचू शकतात. म्हणूनच ही भूमिका अधिकाधिक जणांपर्यंत पोहोचेल हे पण पाहिले पाहिजे.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Minority appeasement: wickedness of secularism in Maharashtra.

Secularism: ‘basic structure’ Constitution of Bharat ensures ‘secularism’ to all citizens of Bharat. Infact Preamble to the Constitution was amended in 1976 by Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act to incorporate the word ‘secular’. And now it is considered as a part of ‘basic structure’ under the concept of ‘basic structure’. So much is the importance of ‘secularism’ to us.

There are many aspects one should take into consideration while dwelling upon the idea of secularism. Where did this concept/word originate? And why? Did Bharat have much better concept and principles to serve the intended purpose? Are religion and Dharma one and the same? What is the difference? I will not go into that debate as it will deviate from the issue in concern. But for the sake of understanding we can take the meaning of secularism as ‘equal to all religions’. And this will be acceptable to all of us except few extremists, for whom we shouldn’t care!

Therefore duty cast upon the State is to endeavor for preserving ‘secularism’ not only through its advertisements but also through its schemes, programmes and policies. But stooping to low levels of minority appeasement for vote politics is not new for us. It should be opposed tooth and nail. Syllabuses may contain lessons of ‘Ram and Rahim were friends in a village’ etc. but if your policies aim at division of population on religious lines hardly those lessons will help.

A good case challenging the constitutionality of religion based scholarships has lost in Bombay High Court recently. Now they have filed Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court against the High Court order. It is learnt that SC has issued notices to Central and State Govts. Lets see what happens next.

Minority WelfareThe State Government of Maharashtra has separate Ministry for Minority Development. Under this Ministry the Govt. spends money on certain religious communities. This money is tax-payers’ money coming from majority community in major proportion. This needs allocation on development issues which are beneficial to all irrespective of religion, caste, creed, race, language etc. But under the guise of ‘minority development’, State Govt is wasting money on non-developmental issues. They may consider it as ‘investment’ which will reap them some votes. But it surely is detrimental to secularism and faith of people, especially majority Hindu community, in the State.

Allocating State Fund – State already has a Haj House in Mumbai which assists Muslims to go on Haj pilgrimage. ‘Haj subsidy’ issue is famous. SC also held its validity. Poor Muslims may be assisted to visit Mecca. And that is continued. Now recently CM Prithviraj Chavan inaugurated a new Haj House at Ganjipeth, Nagpur. This Haj House has come up on 19,000 sq.ft. It was completed by spending ` 15.5 crore. It has 40 rooms with 10-person each capacityState Govt worked very hard and efficiently in this regard and accomplished the promise!
 


We are not sad about it, and we are not happy either. Had we been so rich and contented we could have supported it. That is not the case unfortunately. State Government of Maharashtra is very poor according to its own statements on various occasions. But that’s only when developmental and other issues are on table. Tell them that ‘minority’ community is involved in it, instantly they will swing into action releasing more funds than demand persists. Infact at the inauguration of this newly built Haj House, CM Prithviraj Chavan has demanded ` 500 crore from Centre towards various developmental activities for minority communities in 10 districts of state. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Chavan-demands-Rs-500-cr-from-Centre-for-minority-welfare/articleshow/10282517.cms)

prevailing Haj House in Mumbai
Let us look at some examples where Govt has said it has no money or shown apathy to take up the work giving reasons of financial crunch.
1)      1)    No fund for ‘sainik schools’ – Sainik School in Satara is facing problems. The school principal Lt-Col Matthew Meriken says he has spent most of his tenure chasing bureaucrats to speed up the release of funds for the school. Maharashtra state school education secretary J M Phatak, while admitting that there were no funds for Sainik Schools in the state budget, says that ‘‘certain funds’’ have been approved for release, but held up because of a financial crunch. http://www.indianexpress.com/oldStory/5948/
2)    State has no funds to buy power for Thane, Pune – Electricity consumers in Thane, Navi Mumbai, Pune, Mulund and Bhandup have been going through two to three hours of loadshedding for the past three days. This, despite the fact that they pay an additional 43 paise per unit to state power company Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL). The extra amount is for the energy that the MSEDCL draws from outside the state. According to a source, these areas need 350 MW of electricity more on a daily basis in order to bring their loadshedding hours to nil. Though the MSEDCL has the permission to spend only Rs 9.30 per unit to buy energy from outside Maharashtra, the rates are not less than Rs 13 per unit.  As a result, the five urban pockets in the state are plunged into hours of loadshedding. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-04-08/mumbai/28039522_1_gas-based-power-plant-purchase-power-mw
3)    No money for increment in salary of aadarsh shikshak – The State Govt cannot pay the due increase in payment of Aadarsh shikshaks (ideal teachers) chosen by itself. Reason? No funds! http://www.esakal.com/esakal/20110312/5540913486533169453.htm
Such is the condition of State Government. Why then it spends money on non-developmental issues? Think.. Can this Government serve your purpose? Is it really secular? Where is going the money you pay in form of tax? Do they deserve the posts we have given them? Is it not mockery of our faith in the State Government? Can poor and undernourished be divided on the lines of religion? Hindu children in melghaat and Chadrapur, Bhandara deserve no empathy, aid and help from State? And that too only because they are Hindus? Urban poor having Hindu faith cannot get religion based scholarship, which his ‘minority’ neighbour can very well avail of, only because he was born as a ‘Hindu’?
 mouthful on whose labor? Generosity upon whose property?
  









References:
5)